Lucius Iunius Brutus of Troy, Founder of Britain´s Kingdom versus Marcus Iunius Brutus, Assassin of Julius Caesar

Text & Analysis by Moni Escobar, King Arthur I + King Arthur II of Wales, the original fb group since 7/2015

There is another variant of the Brvt - Brutus - coin. Amazingly, it features the letters "Eid Mar" on the reverse, which may actually refer to Aedd Mawr, father of Aeneas.

Could the inscription "Eid Mar" be an indication that Brutus, who is depicted on the face of the coin, descended from the patrician family of Aedd Mawr? I think yes, it is the case.

I think the description of the coin shown on the Fitzwilliam Museum Cambridge[1] website is an illusion and a misinterpretation of the Livy story of Brutus of Troy. The coin's description claims that it was Brutus who killed Julius Caesar and that Eid Mar would refer to the date of the murder, which was the month of March. I think that's nonsense because one would have to wonder if this Brutus who murdered Caesar was actually of such high rank that he deserved to have his head engraved on a coin? I think Caesar's foster son, Octavius

The Livy story is about Brutus supposedly banishing the Tarquins and their descendants from the family of his father Silvanus and there are two versions of it:

A youth kills both his parents and the other story tells of a consul ordering the execution of his two sons and with it perishes the paradigm of the superior virtue of inflexible and unconditional loyalty to the Republic. Alan describes it as a comparison to 20th-century Republican propaganda.

In fact, Brutus lost his mother, who was of the House of Tarquin, during childbirth, and lost his father during a hunt, being accidentally fatally struck by Brutus' arrow.

Part II:

To this day we believe the official story of the assassination of Caesar by a so called „Brutus“ has truly happened. What makes us so safe to believe it?

I doubt. I believe that the Caesar assassin named Marcus Brutus didn't exist and instead he is maybe confused with Brutus of Troy and his accident story where he accidentally hits his father Silvanus with the arrow while hunting. His mother died while giving birth to Brutus. She was of House Tarquin. It is said that Marcus Junius Brutus murdered Caesar with the dagger and Marcus is placed in the genealogy of Lucius Junius Brutus. That's unrealistic. The timeline is wrong. If the story of Julius Caesar and his murder is not true, then eventually we may be confronted with a millennium lie.

The murder of Caesar reminds me of all later conspiracy crimes during the Middle Ages and above all the attempts to destroy the monarchy since King Louis XIV and all revolutions in the form of government overthrows, Napoleon, Ukraine, Arab Spring, etc.

Only the history of the Welsh nation seems to remain hidden and not talked about. The public academic and college opinion is that Troy only existed in Homer's imagination. The patricians of the Brutus line are kept secret in connection with the Welsh kings. It is not Alan Wilson who is wrong, but rather the many confusions of historians who, perhaps to the benefit of the ruling elites, have had to write history differently to the detriment of the Khumry. The winner writes history, is a common saying. But was that really the case?

Perhaps we don't really realize that the language of the Khumry Nation, which is at least 4000 years old, is the only key to investigating historical events. In particular of coinage and characters on old tablets.

Maybe I'm not even allowed to have these thoughts, because it´s politically incorrect these days.

It is important to read the Brutus chapter in Alan's book (Book: „The King Arthur Conspiracy“[2]) several times. Slow. Everything Alan Wilson has ever researched and written in his books makes sense. He has done what I believe to be the finest work of excellence in unraveling the many confusions that historians have caused throughout the centuries. I'm not suggesting that Alan says the Caesar murder didn't happen. I support this thesis myself.

But the fact is that in the book "Arthur Conspiracy", Alan critically analyzes the misinterpretations of the Roman - the Greek - and the Livy versions. However, the alleged murder of Caesar by another Brutus is accepted in public opinion worldwide.